./emilychang blog
twittering: @scrivener easy vegan chili: two cans of beans, can of corn, tomato sauce, chili powder... serve over rice! @maxkiesler can send u recipes
I’m still thinking about simplicity/minimalism vs. experiential and emotional experiences. If memory is strongly attributed to adrenaline, then shouldn’t we design for optimal emotional attachment? Or, do we design so it’s “so simple” that you don’t have to think about it?
The folder-file organizational structure of current operating systems (OS) does nothing to trigger emotional attachment or memory, nor is it simple and minimal. Too many paths, not enough experience. It’s too much like a file cabinet and nothing like my mind. So it feels like work, not life.
Data and interaction need to be associated in context to trigger a memory.
recent posts
Eye vs. Eye and Kern: iPhone Games for Designers
blog topics
archives
By dateBy topic
selected posts
My Data StreamDesign 2.0: Minimalism, Transparency, and You
Next entry: Thoughtful Reduction and the Miniaturization of Expression
Previous entry: My Data Stream
recent readers
Recently
Subscribe
Daily Stream
See what I'm doing online in my data stream, a daily river of my digital activity.
blog | stream | eHub | photos | videos | about | subscribe | ./ideacodes
Emily Chang is an award-winning strategic designer and co-founder and principal of Ideacodes.com, a web consultancy in San Francisco that focuses on the design and user experience of next generation websites, social applications and networked communities. Learn more...
This site is copyleft under a Creative Commons license.
1 comment(s)
Emily your comparison between mind and OS is interesting.
Trackback URL: Trackbacks are disabled for this entry